That is not correct.30 is much, much better than 25 though.
30 is much, much better than 25 though.
That is not correct.
The album is already out the top 40 in the US which is a bit surprising giving it’s Adele. They should probably release something else to get a bit of momentum but they probably don’t really care, given how successful it was initially.
Hun. Adele's physical sales are huge and will have made her a pretty penny on this record. So this is... not relevant.The truth is since streaming took over and this girlies make 50p from album sales they're not really feeling the album cycle and the work it requires.
Hun. Adele's physical sales are huge and will have made her a pretty penny on this record. So this is... not relevant.
Let's not even try to kid ourselves, most of our faves absolutely would go through the entire circus of the album cycle if they could command the sales Adele does.*were
Just because it sold, doesn’t mean it’s memorable or that Adele herself has had any long-lasting interest in itIn general, I find the whole reframing of this era as a flop to be a little... strange? We've had the album for less than 6 months, and it already topped 5 million sales worldwide, while keeping her as relevant and in the public consciousness as she's ever been. Is it as big as 21? Of course not, nothing she does will ever be again, but neither is it Supposed Former Infatuation Junkie (sadly). Give the woman a break!
That's true, though I do think this has a lot more of a public identity as an album than 25, which, to me at least, felt like 'Hello + all the 21 leftovers' as far as the narrative around it was concerned.