I disagree there are zero hooks - all the "to nooot connect", "we doooo connect" follow a pattern that gets repeated from beggining to end. I'll give you this is menacing and dissonant, but her weirdest, zero-hooks, anti-pop first single remains The Gate.
But if that classifies as a hook, "I care for you, care for you" and the recurrent synth flourish on "The Gate" are hooks as well! And catchier than any repeated part on "Atopos". "The Gate" is also more structured and, well,
traditional: it shares the same basic architecture of many other Björk songs. It's just very slow, very quiet, very lengthy and preceded by a long intro.
"Atopos" is weirder in every way. It gets a pass because, as you said, it's bouncy, percussive and its beats simpler than the tapestry of gunshots, ghost screams and car horns Arca wove for
Vulnicura and
Utopia. It still commits all the pop music crimes Björk has been accused of in the last decade though. It's actually so fucking funny, one of those absurd masterpieces of comedy only life itself can come up with: her work has been dismissed as
atonal,
dissonant and
meandering for the past 10 years even when it was light years away from sounding like the Karlheinz Stockhausen realness some listeners maligned it as, and now that it's as atonal, dissonant and meandering as ever—and delightfully unapologetic about it—it's seen as a
return to form, a moment of "ah, now this is more like it!"?
But that fagurts have a tendency to switch, we had already learned from the early work of leading American thinker Nicki Minaj, and that the slightest DUM DUM DUM DUM DUM DUM DUM DUM is enough to loosen up the tightest, most stubbornly clenched musical recti is a proven fact of science.