Perhaps A1 weren't covered because there wasn't much drama to their story?
Yeah true. They could have used the Asian territory success (and tragedy) sub plot, but they had that featured with five.I guess there’s only so much they could cover, but just seems odd them showing a clip of Ready Or Not in the coming up in the next episode but
I think they had a feud with Paul.Perhaps A1 weren't covered because there wasn't much drama to their story?
I think they had a feud with Paul.
The decision to gloss over Boyzone
I didn’t know much about Damage (apart from Jade being Emma Bunton’s husband), so I found their segments really interesting. It seems they launched at the wrong time because, just a few years later, groups like So Solid Crew, Mis-Teeq, and Big Brovaz were thriving without filtering their sound or image.Did the 5ive footage ever get used for a documentary?
The Sean story about Robbie sounds so much like one H from Steps told about his decision to leave after Robbie told him to that I wonder if he just took that story, or if Robbie just spent all his time telling band members to quit.
The decision to gloss over Boyzone + hardly mention any part US bands played in it is interesting.
The fact Damage needed to become more pop while bands like Five used urban influences to add to their bad boys image is.. very questionable
I just binged the first three episodes and it's a nice comfort watch of stuff we all knew and some interesting things every now and again. Aside from my long-held loathing of Gary Barlow's voice, the one thing that stuck with me throughout, was what I thought was a bit of an unfair hit, was when the East 17 guys complained about Biff being able to get a new studio with his "House of Love" money, as if he stole that money out of their pocket.
He produced their big hit, it's only fair he gets a share of royalties too - but he's not the one that signed a record deal and is now in debt to the record label for millions of band investment money, so he's not the one with his cut being recouped.
Oh I understand how they feel too, but I feel like the documentary made Biff out to be the villain in their story without a right of reply. Louis Walsh certainly wouldn't have been in the doc if they'd pressed him on how much money he, Simon or Steve Mac and Wayne Hector made from Westlife before the boys advances were recouped.I imagine their gripe was more that they were being paid the bare minimum while putting in the hours. We all now know this all too common industry story of exploiting the acts while others did nicely out of it but the East 17 boys wouldn’t have known back then, learned the hard way and were rightly pissed off. But yes, Biff played a big part in their early success so deserved his share too.
It's really hard to believe. Like, most of those managers are horrible people too, but at least I see where their ego/need to make themselves the hero in their story stems from.Just adding to the pile-on about the News of the World 'journalist.'
What a vile human being.
I think they might have just decided to not speak (ill) about people who aren't there to tell their side, which I respect.I'm not an expert on FIVE but I always thought Sean partly left due to being bullied by Ritchie and J in the band. Have I made that up or did they just decide to gloss over that fact in the documentary?
I'm not an expert on FIVE but I always thought Sean partly left due to being bullied by Ritchie and J in the band. Have I made that up or did they just decide to gloss over that fact in the documentary?
I think they might have just decided to not speak (ill) about people who aren't there to tell their side, which I respect.
Finished the whole thing.
If there's any more shows like this/The Big Reunion/Steps Reunion, very open to suggestions cause I love these things.