58
SCORE: 5.345
HIGHEST SCORE: 10 x 2 (
@savilizabeths @Subwaykid)
LOWEST SCORE: 0 x 4 (
@Petty Mayonnaise @Seventeen Days @godspeed @Serg.)
MY SCORE: 3/10
What an
annoyingly frantic, manic, jittering, finger-clicky, hand-clappy mess. Did Taylor steal this from the new Jonas Brothers record? Did Jack have too much sugar? His mum normally keeps all the candy in a drawer he can't reach at home!
I
despise these songs that are deliberately produced to sound like some kind of glee club jam session as if they were all just in the same room with a band and it just
happened when the reality is most likely that Jack Antonoff programmed every single instrument on his Dragonball-Z-sticker-emblazoned Macbook Pro and called it a day. It's also when the weird sequencing issues
really start with the album where it lurches from one extreme to the next, culminating in the back half basically being a tonal ping pong match. And we're supposed to reward such demented devilry?
Also, I refuse - refuse - to believe that Taylor Swift did not get secretly married at some point last year and is waiting until the end of the era to announce it so it can be some kind of chapter closing moment in her narrative because she's
crazy and literally needs one of those shots where the camera zooms out from her face, turns it into a picture in a book, before said book closes with
...and they lived happily ever after on the last page. "Paper Rings" is probably the most explicit of Lover's eighty thousand references to marriage. It also contains a reference to people getting high!!!!!! taylor is growing up!!!!!
We have so far been spared a live performance of "Paper Rings" which will no doubt be a complete lyric-mangling disaster on tour because it's one of the few uptempo songs on the album that will actually get a stadium remotely going. Pray for LoverFesters.
Also,
@Laura Vanderbooben if you
ever propose to me with anything other than the severed heads of my forum enemies, never mind
paper rings like we own the village arts and crafts shop, we're done.