I think it's possible to acknowledge/praise the positive difference made by the money and awareness she's donated to various causes while still questioning her intentions and her understanding of those causes. She donated to queer organizations and I don't doubt her intent there is positive but everything about Calm Down makes me doubt her understanding of the community and cause she's donating to.. and she has many years of donating and using her platform for queers before I'd use the word ally. The timing of her "causes" always feel opportunistic or self-centered which makes them feel hollow to me. Nothing about Beyonce's activism feels hollow. "Walking the Walk" isn't moving on to a new cause because there's a PR opportunity, new topical issue, single to promote..etc.. it takes years of dedication.
At the risk of getting dragged, does it really matter what her intentions are if she still ends up donating to these causes?
I think I liked what Amy Poehler said: as a celebrity your donations and philanthropy are always going to get questioned under the guise of whether your intentions are sincere/genuine versus whether you're doing it for good publicity, but at the end of the day does it matter what the intent is because the organizations are still getting money to continue the important work they're doing?
I don't want this to come across as an apologist post to excuse people getting praised for doing the least or bare minimum of activism. I don't think she deserves the effusive praise. Every queer outlet shouldn't have been out here calling her a Gay Icon for doing what any decent person should be doing which is supporting equality. I can understand people taking issue with the media response or the shallow way in which she approached it with You Need To Calm Down.
But I also don't think she deserves the skepticism or questioning of her sincerity because at the end of the day she still did it, regardless of whether she was late to the party in supporting these causes or not. I guess to me, it should just...
be.