2014
Staff member
It’s what they deserve.
I mean both have been way more prominent and needed than Shirley for example, who is so redundant now it hurts.
It’s what they deserve.
I mean both have been way more prominent and needed than Shirley for example, who is so redundant now it hurts.
But you want to include Dana the most Alice Branning character/actor since Alice Branning?Lorraine Stanley’s inability to act is the main sticking point for me.
The only potential Dana has is to be axed before Easter.
Really excellent acting from Zaraah Abrahams tonight. She's fantastic and has done such a fantastic job of adding some depth and further layers to the character of Chelsea.
That final scene with Whitney showing Chelsea having been completely manipulated by Gray was a complete knockout, I actually had to watch it over again because it was done so well and packed such an emotional punch.
Didn't she do this in 2005 as wellZaraah was absolutely phenomenal in this scene, and in the one where she was removing her makeup. Her and Shona work so well together. I really hope the show is able to hold onto her.
Also, not sure if anyone saw this! "Danniella Westbrook plans to sue BBC over EastEnders character replacement" https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news...r.com&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=sharebar
She has no grounds to sue unless it was somehow stated in her contract that she has an exclusive right to play the character. How bizarre.Zaraah was absolutely phenomenal in this scene, and in the one where she was removing her makeup. Her and Shona work so well together. I really hope the show is able to hold onto her.
Also, not sure if anyone saw this! "Danniella Westbrook plans to sue BBC over EastEnders character replacement" https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news...r.com&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=sharebar
Exactly. It's not as if she has any kind of current contract - she was last on the show in 2016. The only way I can think she'd have any sort of case is if the person in charge at the time (was it still Treadwell-Collins) made some kind of verbal, or even written, agreement that she could come back again.She has no grounds to sue unless it was somehow stated in her contract that she has an exclusive right to play the character. How bizarre.
Really they should hire both of them and just use them in alternate weeks. Or episodes. Or scenes! It wouldn't make any less sense than what they've done with the character up to this point.
I definitely was expecting a kiss!The sexual chemistry in that police van
Isn't Stacey's just breakfast rolls though?So Stacey had opened a Sandwich Van... yet Keegan already sells sandwiches on the square?