Highkey perched at the discourse about Critics that this album has been able to captivate because of the Pitchfork and Fantano reviews and how faulty/spotty these critics can be. Like, alright disliking the music and finding it subpar, but don't try to over intellectualize the situation just to get the egg in your face. I know this isn't something new per se, but after drowning in Poptimism within the last years, it feels like things went quiet for some time because no one wanted to rock the boat too much, and now the "rage-bait" is coming in vogue again. I've seen some people also try to say Halsey's post was an attempt of weaponize the fans against the critics "just because it isn't a glowing review" but I really don't see it that way.
Of course, we're talking about pop culture and music doesn't exist in the vacuum all alone to be reviewed, but it is a knife a double-edge sword where you have to acknowledge the different aspects and not just what fits your narrative. Just because it's an album written by someone who is battling a disease makes it good? No, but it for sure justifies what they'd be calling ""main character syndrome"". It's just so out of touch.
I also think there's some gatekeeping happening just because of the fun impersonator roll-out and people truly thinking "how dare she mention Fiona Apple/Kate Bush/anyone as an inspiration??" but I digress.