dmc said:What pisses me off about these campaigns are that they are just following the sheep mentality of those they claim to 'thwart'. Buying something just for the sake of it keeping another song off the top spot is completely idiotic. Listen to ALL the relevant songs you like that week and buy the one YOU want you moron.
I think you're missing the point a bit to be honest. Firstly, if everyone bought the songs they like that week as you suggest, which most people do, that would result in a completely unaltered singles chart, like any normal week, and the X Factor single would be #1 as expected. So no one's made 'a difference'. Secondly, both you and Lost in Japan. are putting words in many people's mouths:
Lost In Japan. said:Yes. That was the one thing which annoyed me the most about the Rage campaign ... was that they were all about non-conformity but were then conforming to a Facebook group and doing what they were told
I really don't believe for a second that most people who bought the Rage song were claiming to go against the 'sheep mentality', etc etc. I know from friends who did buy it and helped it along to #1, that it was an obvious choice: it's a song that loads of people love; a song that came out when people bought cd albums, and many people liked the song but didn't like Rage enough to buy their album... It was a clever choice. It's one of those that people go, "oh, I never bought this at the time, and it's better than The Climb, so now's the time to buy it." I'm not suggesting there weren't people behind the campaign who thought they really were sticking it to The Man, but I don't think they were a majority by any stretch of the imagination. The reaction to the campaign was incredibly po-faced and really it was just a bit of fun, to see if another song really could beat the X Factor machine, and it worked - what's wrong with that?