Slice of Life
Staff member
I wanna vote for Miss @eatyourself too simply because they are a WJSN anti but lemme hear the good sis defend haself first!!

I need to get to work soon but let me just say this - if I were a slasher, the last thing I'd do would be calling out the first vote pulling all attention to me. I would be the least effective slasher ever, because as it is clear to see, a bandwagon was quickly assembled right after the first vote. Now that's what I would find suspicious...I wanna vote for Miss @eatyourself too simply because they are a WJSN anti but lemme hear the good sis defend haself first!!
![]()
I need to get to work soon but let me just say this - if I were a slasher, the last thing I'd do would be calling out the first vote pulling all attention to me. I would be the least effective slasher ever, because as it is clear to see, a bandwagon was quickly assembled right after the first vote. Now that's what I would find suspicious...
Vote change: @Music Is Death
If you want to maintain your vote for a fellow trainee - fine! Some lessons shall be learned at the end of this day.
![]()
I've read this three times and the logic makes no sense to me! Anyway,I need to get to work soon but let me just say this - if I were a slasher, the last thing I'd do would be calling out the first vote pulling all attention to me. I would be the least effective slasher ever, because as it is clear to see, a bandwagon was quickly assembled right after the first vote. Now that's what I would find suspicious...
Vote change: @Music Is Death
If you want to maintain your vote for a fellow trainee - fine! Some lessons shall be learned at the end of this day.
![]()
Baby you’ve tried to get me out first every season of the game and it’s never worked!
I've read this three times and the logic makes no sense to me!
I love an Oscar-winning performance.
Then why would you pull all the attention to you anyway? I mean, excuse me for being suspicious of literally everyone on the first day. I just never like the "voting for person for no real reason argument" that you used for @Crisp X. That's suspicious to me. Yes, she's been quiet but so have a handful of people. Now I'm not saying you're definitively a slasher but once I assumed people agreed with me I figured I might as well vote for you as well. Overall, your argument is strong about not being a slasher, but I'm curious if you have any real reason for voting for @Crisp X or were just trying to stir things up and get the ball rolling?I need to get to work soon but let me just say this - if I were a slasher, the last thing I'd do would be calling out the first vote pulling all attention to me. I would be the least effective slasher ever, because as it is clear to see, a bandwagon was quickly assembled right after the first vote. Now that's what I would find suspicious...
Vote change: @Music Is Death
If you want to maintain your vote for a fellow trainee - fine! Some lessons shall be learned at the end of this day.
![]()
Now see, people complain about players being too quiet and not active and then when you actually play the game (and win!) people hold grudges!!!I don't like voting for bandwagons so I'm not voting @Music Is Death and @eatyourself hasn't done anything otherwise suspicious....
BUT I do still have trust issues from last season so
VOTE: @junglefish
![]()
Thank you! I like to think I am but I also know it's just the first day and I'm kind of running around and guessing. I didn't actually mean to start anything against @eatyourself. I was just pointing out that it was kinda suspicious that he voted first. Other people agreed with and ran with it by voting for him.they’re pretty smart.
@Attis would have to be a special kind of sadist to make me a slasher for the third time in a row.
Well I don't have anything to base my vote on, so I just fabricated some evidence! Last round was a little too still and this time I want things to evolve quickly, and look where my little bluff took us! A whole page of accusations, which is what we're all here for. So I reiterate that my intentions were the purest and that I also don't have any reason to vote for you besides you voting for me. I don't know how many times we can change votes but I'm sure we can still work this out! And don't worry, I won't take anything personally before the last rounds.Then why would you pull all the attention to you anyway? I mean, excuse me for being suspicious of literally everyone on the first day. I just never like the "voting for person for no real reason argument" that you used for @Crisp X. That's suspicious to me. Yes, she's been quiet but so have a handful of people. Now I'm not saying you're definitively a slasher but once I assumed people agreed with me I figured I might as well vote for you as well. Overall, your argument is strong about not being a slasher, but I'm curious if you have any real reason for voting for @Crisp X or were just trying to stir things up and get the ball rolling?
The whole voting for the quiet one on day 1 makes no sense, cause some people just live in a different timezone. That can only work from day 2 onwards.. It seems like throwing darts at the blank paper.
However if we wanna take out someone who is potentially a slasher based on some shady stuff going on in the messages...between them going back to their old strategy that doesn't work and ghosting people in the DMs, we're lacking anything of substance, so I cast my vote for @soratami
![]()