D
Deleted member 33252
Okay, it was just an assumption nn.
Even if she was just being cheeky, when she belligerently slammed her hands down on Jimmy Fallon’s question cards because “artists are here to disturb the peace!”, I thought to myself, “some think piecer is gonna pick up on how she’s using James Baldwin’s quotation and a harsh rebuke is going to come out of it.”
Hasn’t happened yet, but tick tock…
It's such a rich person mentality that working for nothing is somehow romantic.
BBC2 are showing this over Christmas, along with Truth Or Dare:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/mediapacks/christmas-tv-2021
She might as well just dye her hair brunette at this point.
She fixed her roots. Probably a minority opinion, but I don’t think she looks good as a brunette. With her pale skin it makes her look like Elvira or Morticia Adams.
She is with Julia Fox of Uncut Gems who is rumored to be in the running for the biopic.
She is with Julia Fox of Uncut Gems who is rumored to be in the running for the biopic.
I love her and always will.. but for an icon that has served us countless instances of actual boundary pushing art (music, videos, film..etc) to stress an !!ART!! discourse over what ultimately amounts to a glamour photo shoot (she's done an iteration of 20+ times) not covering any new artistic ground but this time no one gets paid... but its fine because true artists will starve to disturb the peace for Madame X....etc it's just bizarre! Mama the worms in your brain have more in their bank accounts than the starving artists that actually "disturb the peace". Pay for your glamour shoot. You're Madame X not Katniss Everdeen.
Last edited:
matthew.
Staff member
I only see this as a compliment?
I personally don’t find it a flattering look. But taste varies.
Oof that post has generated yet another round of negative headlines. The unfortunate thing is unlike some past (iconic) controversies it's hard to defend her or think, well she has a point. Put away the cutlery, unbraid your hair and pay your people!
Why are wealthy people always so cheap nn
This is interesting about V Magazine.
https://nyulocal.com/inside-v-magazines-unpaid-internship-program-f61ef60f31e2
I don’t know the answer to this question, but if the people working on the shoot are interns or employees of V Magazine are the subjects of photo shoots allowed to pay them separately?
https://nyulocal.com/inside-v-magazines-unpaid-internship-program-f61ef60f31e2
I don’t know the answer to this question, but if the people working on the shoot are interns or employees of V Magazine are the subjects of photo shoots allowed to pay them separately?
She usually works within whatever budget is available for any given project and her money is her money. This doesn't excuse people not being paid, but it's nothing new that her mentality is "we're all in this together as starving artists" since that's probably genuinely how she sees it. Her Facetune retoucher ain't getting a cent of her millions.
he/him
Her comment about "non-artistic people" is still killing me because of how ridiculously over-the-top it is. Serving
You just need one of those NON-CREATIVE PEOPLE to GET. ON. YOUR. NERVES
You just need one of those NON-CREATIVE PEOPLE to GET. ON. YOUR. NERVES
he/him
The funny thing is the crew that worked on this shoot (which was about, like, 5 people total) are already her day to day staff so they’re already being paid to begin with. It’s just her playing up the whole starving artists bit. She got herself dragged for no reason.
