https://www.wsj.com/business/media/live-nation-justice-department-antitrust-lawsuit-ab98c268
Swift was the biggest revenue-generating recording artist in the world in 2023, according to IFPI, followed by SEVENTEEN at No.2, Stray Kids at No.3, Drake at No.4, and The Weekend at No.5 – all of whom are distributed and/or signed to Universal Music Group
What I do know about the K-Pop groups mentioned in that exerp and also this is a pretty common thing for Kpop groups to do is release multiple versions where fans will buy in bulk to get into things like fan signings. Hence the really inflated numbers. I know those two groups are pretty notorious for it. Fans will a lot of money sometimes even hundreds.https://www.musicbusinessworldwide....rated-51-of-2023-recorded-music-annual-report
Quite an interesting read overall, but this in particular
really bewildered me. I'm not a fan of K-pop and am aware of how little I know about the entire eco-system, but I have at least *heard* of some of the bigger names like BTS or Blackpink. But if two essentially niche acts with little name recognition (because *I* am clearly ignorant, but I bet that if you stopped random people in the street anywhere in the Americas or Europe, they wouldn't be able to tell you who they are either) can be the 2nd and 3rd biggest revenue-generators in the industry, above Drake (❗️) and the Weeknd, surely that's indicative of a massive shift in how stardom works and is monetised?
Two things I'd love to hear people's thoughts about:
- Have streaming services and Spotify in particular finally found a way to monetise consumption by regions traditionally resistant to paying for their music, thereby integrating them into the worldwide metrics framework, and helping artists with limited big-tent appeal (in the West or otherwise) but a fervent regional or subcultural fanbase, come to the fore? All of a sudden your favourite's #1 in Bahrain doesn't seem so bad if that's the case.
- Again, that could just be the circles that *I* move in, but I don't think (m)any *songs* by these clearly massively popular K-pop acts have entered the broader cultural vernacular in any meaningful way. Here in the UK at least I don't hear them on the radio, they're not played at any 'mainstream pop' parties I go to, the media/podcasts I follow don't talk about the music (though plenty of discussion of their cultural significance). Am I missing something, or is the actual music somewhat auxiliary to their fame at this level*?
Sorry of all of those are question that have been discussed to death elsewhere, I'm late to the party as per usual.
____________________________
* Absolutely no comment about the quality of said music. It's not for me, but many things aren't that are still very, very good, and that's ok. I'm talking about cultural relevance more than anything.
Explain how I now have over 10 Sugababes records, and 4 cassettes and still don’t own a record or cassette player.People never bought albums to 'support' artists. Even gays who say 'I bought 3 cassettes to support Louise' are lying.
Most of the time, yes. But it happens to buy CDs/LPs/merchandising from an artist, even if you don’t like anything specific, just to show support. It happens all the times with collectors, and now that music is mostly available for free, I think more and more people will decide to spend their money on someone not just to listen but just to show support.People never bought albums to 'support' artists. Even gays who say 'I bought 3 cassettes to support Louise' are lying.
People aways bought albums to listen to that specific song they heard on the radio / at a party / on TV. Now they can listen to the song on Youtube or Spotify, they're good.
Curious case? We're in a recession, case closed.