I agree. But I'm just happy that we're getting Yearbooks for the 2000s! Hope we get "Extra" CDs as well.These years deserved their own yearbooks, but on first glance the tracklists aren't bad!
Because for me my first NOW was 44, and my fascination only grew in the 00s. So the lack of acknowledgement from the NOW team about that decade is kinda heartbreaking, but now they are finally getting to my era. Sadly I feel like I'm the only one - the comments in the fan group on Facebook are so elitist it makes me cringe.But what is exciting about it?
Because for me my first NOW was 44, and my fascination only grew in the 00s. So the lack of acknowledgement from the NOW team about that decade is kinda heartbreaking, but now they are finally getting to my era. Sadly I feel like I'm the only one - the comments in the fan group on Facebook are so elitist it makes me cringe.
Plus it's nice to see The Corrs, Cher, P!nk, A1, Len, Missy Elliott, Alcazar finally get song appearances on NOW albums similar to the Numbered ones. I Remember getting so annoyed when NOW 46/47 didn't have Breathless. 8 year old me was heartbroken!
Completely agree. Whatever the perceived merits of the 90s and 00s, they should be treated the same as the 70s and 80s....one volume per year.While I'm glad the 2000s is finally getting some much needed compilation attention, it's a shame they feel they have to combine 2 years per volume,
Now 80s Alternative out on June 16th....
Crash should have followed Car Trouble!Here is the tracklisting![]()
Driving Away From HomeCrash should have followed Car Trouble!