Everyone was laughing at it, not with it.
Well I won't argue this point - but cinephiles aren't paragons of a cultural "zietgeist".
Elphaba Thropp
Yes correctNow what is this implication that The Substance is some high prestige, inaccessible filmé only appreciated by tru cinephiles
Now what is this implication that The Substance is some high prestige, inaccessible filmé only appreciated by tru cinephiles in comparison to "MTV Movie Awards contender" Wicked. It's a silly trashy dark comedy
Not to mention a lead that’s a veteran actress past her peak and sell by date (acc to Hollywood) being triumphant at her roleThe Substance will definately have a sunstantial effect on the future of horror cinema, whilst also breaking down the old stimagas attached to starring in horror, and probably the pushing of gore boundaries in mainstream cinema for the next few years to come.
Now, I'm parachuting out of here - but that's not what I was implying at least. The post @yearone wrote just mentioned that Demi was some sort of supernova in the greater culture against the other actress nominees - and I just found that statement sorta not all the way baked comparatively when you think about Cynthia and Wicked.
But since we're talking about cinephiles
![]()
The Oscars aren't the MTV Movie Awards. Demi in her yellow coat alone is a million times more impactful to cinephiles than anything that came out of Wicked.
I said it wasn't the MTV Movie awards because the person with the Ariana avatar was making implications about Wicked's box office. The Oscars don't award Box Office. That's something the MTV Movie Awards, People's Choice - hell, even the Globes awards. Not the Oscars.I was actually referring to this
Wicked and The Substance are both genre movies. "Demeaning" Wicked to make The Substance look better as if the latter is some high prestige product is ??
I mean the original post AlmightyAloud was replying to was about The Substance's supposed cultural impact, not about who was more deserving in terms of acting. The topic was very much about successI said it wasn't the MTV Movie awards because the person with the Ariana avatar was making implications about Wicked's box office. The Oscars don't award Box Office. That's something the MTV Movie Awards, People's Choice - hell, even the Globes awards. Not the Oscars.
By logic awards should be given based on how big the movie was, Tom Holland and Margot Robbie would be Oscar winners...and Wicked wasn't even that big of a box office hit.
Well...I just also don't think Wicked was this huge cultural moment they're making it out to be. It certainly wasn't Barbie (which also didn't deserve any of the Oscars it lost). Maybe for a few weeks in November is was a big deal - but given how huge the source material is, it certainly wasn't the Frozen or Harry Potter they were hoping it would be. The repeated "fifth biggest film of the year!!" (which...given the budget and promo is not that impressive) doesn't mean anyone deserves an Oscar - which is what I thought this thread was to discuss.I mean the original post AlmightyAloud was replying to was about The Substance's supposed cultural impact, not about who was more deserving in terms of acting. The topic was very much about success
And besides... tell that to Oscars Fan Favorite and Oscars Cheer Moment winner Zack Snyder (lol remember that)
Well...I just also don't think Wicked was this huge cultural moment they're making it out to be. It certainly wasn't Barbie (which also didn't deserve any of the Oscars it lost). Maybe for a few weeks in November is was a big deal - but given how huge the source material is, it certainly wasn't the Frozen or Harry Potter they were hoping it would be. The repeated "fifth biggest film of the year!!" (which...given the budget and promo is not that impressive) doesn't mean anyone deserves an Oscar - which is what I thought this thread was to discuss.
Look, it's not that serious. Let's all just hope Demi wins an Oscar and just move along.