Rep. David Trone, one of the wealthiest members of Congress, spent over $60 million of his own fortune to try to win a Democratic Senate primary. The Associated Press called the election for his competitor, Angela Alsobrooks.
Trone, a three-term House Democrat, made millions before entering politics by co-founding Total Wine & More, the nation's largest private wine retailer. In a striking pitch to voters, he argued that his vast wealth was an asset to the Democratic Party and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer. Schumer can't afford to lose the Senate seat if he wants to keep the party's slim majority in the chamber. Trone's point was that if the party has to spend money defending Maryland, it will have less available in other close races.
fffff suffer!
But that is a disgustingly wasteful amount of money. So many good things could have been done with that.
Yeah I don't know if I believe the stat, but this is where I'm at too. The apathy alone is going to lift Trump.The Biden camp should be acting like Trump could win 22% of black voters.
This made me laugh.
I think the issue is that Biden's problems are unique to Biden and thus the midterms or special elections are not really a congruent comparison to try and gauge how accurate current polling is. And if we did, it was polling in years like 2022 that accurately predicted a red wave wasn't happening despite pundits saying the otherwise.Polls are really really strange right now and have been completely off with Dem races for the last two years. It seems as if they have adjusted their methodology to weigh Trump supporters more heavily to offset polling errors from ‘16 and ‘20, but are now possibly overestimating him. There is zero evidence backing up any substantial shift among Black voters from Biden to Trump let alone this earth shattering historic realignment. If anything, Biden has lost support among Black voters and they simply will not turnout to vote — they aren’t going to suddenly swing to Trump. News organizations are pushing this narrative because it gets clicks.
I definitely agree with most of what you're saying, but there were quite a few polls predicting a red wave in places like Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania, among others in 2022. That being said, I don't want to flat out discredit polls either, because they are more-so snapshots in time and definitely not great predictors 6 months out."His team", mama, that's Jamie Raskin ddd.
I think the issue is that Biden's problems are unique to Biden and thus the midterms or special elections are not really a congruent comparison to try and gauge how accurate current polling is. And if we did, it was polling in years like 2022 that accurately predicted a red wave wasn't happening despite pundits saying the otherwise.
Democrat success in 2018, for example, was herald as the suburban revolt and all these affluent white suburban moms voting in a bunch of centrist Dems (most of whom are no longer in office) yet Trump increased his share of Republicans in 2020. Biden's 2020 victory was largely herald (rightfully) by a historic increase in youth turnout, despite attempts by some centrist Dem operatives to claim a Trump swing voter that never materialized deserved credit.
Cross-tabs are weird right now and entering a new territory, but I think a fatal flaw in commentary is pundits thinking confusing cross-tabs somehow discredits the top-lines, when such is just not the case.
THIS PART.Cross-tabs are weird right now and entering a new territory, but I think a fatal flaw in commentary is pundits thinking confusing cross-tabs somehow discredits the top-lines, when such is just not the case.
It’s almost like fully funding government agencies actually works!
Cnalysis and Split Ticket are both pretty good. Their predictions were nearly spot on with the 2022 results while many other politicos were calling for a red wave. Cnalysis is especially great because they are the only ones that do a forecast for state legislatures!These days, who do y'all follow for the most insightful analysis of the polls / the 2024 horse race?