on this forum we set our expectations incredibly high for what we expect from our pop music
Do we?
There is honestly a lot to be said about the fact that a lot of the hate (that I can say is coming from cis white gay men) is directly stemming from the fact they are not sexually attracted to Sam and had ANY cisgender white twunk been in the same video with the same settings, styling and storyboards, they would be lapping it up as a serve.
It has nothing to even do with the song and the video is so sexually tame, it’s laughable that is the rhetoric the press and twitter is spewing. It’s about the trans joy and body positivity emanating from this video.
There is honestly a lot to be said about the fact that a lot of the hate (that I can say is coming from cis white gay men) is directly stemming from the fact they are not sexually attracted to Sam and had ANY cisgender white twunk been in the same video with the same settings, styling and storyboards, they would be lapping it up as a serve.
It has nothing to even do with the song and the video is so sexually tame, it’s laughable that is the rhetoric the press and twitter is spewing. It’s about the trans joy and body positivity emanating from this video.
So much of it comes from the fact that Sam has embraced their body at multiple points, and them experiencing joy and comfort directly opposes modern white-gay standards of "my personality is the gym", "I only gained weight to be a bear", "I'm now thick but still conventionally attractive", etc. So many cis white gay men (including white Latinx gays) rest upon a thinly-veiled adherence to specific visual goalposts, and Sam not adhering to those ideals while finding joy and still minding their business is a reminder that being content with oneself doesn't look one way. It absolutely threatens their own construction of identity, and for them to attack Sam says soooooo much more about them, than anything about Sam's own comfort.There is honestly a lot to be said about the fact that a lot of the hate (that I can say is coming from cis white gay men) is directly stemming from the fact they are not sexually attracted to Sam and had ANY cisgender white twunk been in the same video with the same settings, styling and storyboards, they would be lapping it up as a serve.
It has nothing to even do with the song and the video is so sexually tame, it’s laughable that is the rhetoric the press and twitter is spewing. It’s about the trans joy and body positivity emanating from this video.
So much of it comes from the fact that Sam has embraced their body at multiple points, and them experiencing joy and comfort directly opposes modern white-gay standards of "my personality is the gym", "I only gained weight to be a bear", "I'm now thick but still conventionally attractive", etc. So many cis white gay men (including white Latinx gays) rest upon a thinly-veiled adherence to specific visual goalposts, and Sam not adhering to those ideals while finding joy and still minding their business is a reminder that being content with oneself doesn't look one way. It absolutely threatens their own construction of identity, and for them to attack Sam says soooooo much more about them, than anything about Sam's own comfort.
Dd plenty of subpar pop gets forgiven or embraced on here on account of who's singing it.
Sam constantly has to clear some kind of hurdle just to earn some civilised discussion. We're harder on them for whatever reason (possibly because they don't match everyone's image of queerness, and people love to project) than most of the women Popjustice stans, many of whom get an easy ride, and I don't think that's contentious.
So to say the critical discussion of Sam stems entirely from the forum wanting the best pop music possible rings untrue to me. (Lose You is a Diamonds-tier banger and barely anyone can even be bothered discussing it...)
It absolutely threatens their own construction of identity, and for them to attack Sam says soooooo much more about them, than anything about Sam's own comfort.