It goes to show that cancer affects all ages. If there is one positive outcome of this is that it might give visibility to the needs of these patients.
Yeah a 3 sentence statement a month ago would have stopped any of this from happening.It didn't need to be like this at all. She didn't have to be plonked in front of a camera at an already traumatic time to tell the world about a cancer diagnosis after the internet had run wild with speculation and memery for weeks on end, and eroding (probably irrepairably) any trust the public might have had in the family or their public communications.
Just fire their dinosaur PR team top to bottom, honestly. Nobody deserves to keep a job after this.
They could simply have said it was a medical issue which she was receiving treatment for and she wasn't ready to share it yet. The public (or vast majority of them anyway) would have given her the space she needed to regain enough strength and reveal all when she was good and ready.But surely even a royal is allowed privacy to determine when they want a cancer diagnosis shared?
They could simply have said it was a medical issue which she was receiving treatment for and she wasn't ready to share it yet. The public (or vast majority of them anyway) would have given her the space she needed to regain enough strength and reveal all when she was good and ready.
Then can they stop benefiting from my tax money cheersWhy are people so nosy, why can't someone be ill in private. Sad people live their lives on social media as they are beyond comprehension. Her condition and all the bitching online is vile. I don't care for the Royals, but leave the poor woman alone.
I don't like them at all, but their medical records are none of our business.Then can they stop benefiting from my tax money cheers