Should have been much higher. Seriously, who is giving these Taller and Change duds such high scores?
I think the B-side syndrome works particularly badly against the Babes, because a lot of them go against the grain of their respective albums' sound in being more experimental. Most people rate the B-sides last, and so when they encounter these ones in particular, the variance in sound would come as a shock, obstructing an appreciation of the finer details, especially the lyrics (see here). It also prevents people from giving any leeway for the understandably less polished production, I think.I guess a lot of people just don't "get" the B-sides?
Or they're just lazyI think the B-side syndrome works particularly badly against the Babes, because a lot of them go against the grain of their respective albums' sound in being more experimental. Most people rate the B-sides last, and so when they encounter these ones in particular, the variance in sound would come as a shock, obstructing an appreciation of the finer details, especially the lyrics (see here). It also prevents people from giving any leeway for the understandably less polished production, I think.
I rate them per era but if I would rate them last it would mean I would listen to the bsides after sweet 7. It means I would be highest scorer for the bsides. I do know a lot of bsides through and through which made it easy rating for me.I think the B-side syndrome works particularly badly against the Babes, because a lot of them go against the grain of their respective albums' sound in being more experimental. Most people rate the B-sides last, and so when they encounter these ones in particular, the variance in sound would come as a shock, obstructing an appreciation of the finer details, especially the lyrics (see here). It also prevents people from giving any leeway for the understandably less polished production, I think.