Worst album covers

I honestly can't stand the Digital cover for Solid Harmonie's album, i don't understand why it was changed. Its so unnecessarily dark and presents itself as a moody type of album which couldn't be further from accurate











I prefer the original






My copy of the CD has the top (darker) cover image. I wasn't aware there was another cover. I remember having to get Virgin Megastore to order it in for me as they didn't have it in stock and having to pay £15-16 for the privilege. I prefer the top one tbh.
 

Mvnl

Staff member
I must admit I don't know SH discography, but according to their Discogs pages, the timings are the same for 1997 and 1998 releases. It just seems they simply changed the cover. Nothing else. I think it's the first time I see this happening.

Natalie's Left Of The Middle had two covers as well, never knew what was up with that either (I assume one was an import?)

Also, what new album?

ab67616d0000b273c6ea8fa7b7dcbbe5bd0d4cb6


This one came out but doesn't feature any singles and isn't green?
 
Natalie's Left Of The Middle had two covers as well, never knew what was up with that either (I assume one was an import?)

Essentially, the album was released with it's original artwork and the label felt it wasn't clear that it was Natalie Imbruglia on the cover. So it was very quickly re-issued with a close-up of her face*. I actually like both covers but I think the first one is more interesting.

*I wonder if there's more to it than that but haven't found any other information.
 
Essentially, the album was released with it's original artwork and the label felt it wasn't clear that it was Natalie Imbruglia on the cover. So it was very quickly re-issued with a close-up of her face*. I actually like both covers but I think the first one is more interesting.

*I wonder if there's more to it than that but haven't found any other information.
They re-swizz the tracklist on the re-issue as well, move Wishing I Was There further up. Although looking on Discogs that might come a little later?
 
Essentially, the album was released with it's original artwork and the label felt it wasn't clear that it was Natalie Imbruglia on the cover. So it was very quickly re-issued with a close-up of her face*. I actually like both covers but I think the first one is more interesting.

*I wonder if there's more to it than that but haven't found any other information.

Yes the album didn't pull up trees on release, despite Torn, so when the next single did well, the label obviously decided the album needed remarketing and replaced the original with the close-up version. I like both. In fact, I paid 75p recently to get the second, close-up, version just for posterity.
 
Yes the album didn't pull up trees on release, despite Torn, so when the next single did well, the label obviously decided the album needed remarketing and replaced the original with the close-up version. I like both. In fact, I paid 75p recently to get the second, close-up, version just for posterity.

Oh, I never knew that. I love the close up cover so much.
 
Thing is, some people do still buys things based on amazing/striking album covers. It's still a draw to people who perhaps might not buy something initially. Having such awful artwork can have the opposite effect and even prevent real fans from purchasing something because they wouldn't want to own it on vinyl when it looks so cheap and terrible. The thinking behind some of these covers is just so questionable.
 
Kelly Llorenna had some horrible artwork, bless her. I think she could look quite pretty but whoever took these shots made her look like she should be shovelling chips rather than gracing pop stages. I do miss Kelly, I wish she'd come back.

s-l1600.jpg

NC5qcGVn.jpeg
MS0xNzY2LmpwZWc.jpeg
 
Top